Introduction

In the grand salon of philosophical thinkers, where the air buzzes with the exchange of profound ideas, René Girard would perhaps be the intriguing figure in the corner, quietly sketching the blueprint of human desire and conflict. Born in France in 1923 and later becoming a beacon of interdisciplinary thought in the United States, Girard was not your garden-variety academic. With a scholarly career that spanned several decades, Girard was a historian, literary critic, and anthropologist of the highest order, but above all, he was a philosopher who dared to look beyond the obvious.

Girard’s theories cut through the fabric of literature, anthropology, psychology, and theology, weaving a narrative that is as compelling as it is contentious. He challenged the autonomy of human desire, proposing instead that our wants are imitative, mirrored from those around us. This mimetic desire, as he termed it, is the bedrock of human conflict, leading to a cycle of violence and scapegoating that societies resolve through sacrificial rituals. Girard’s insights do not just offer a lens to view literature or anthropology; they provide a comprehensive framework to understand the very essence of human society and the conflicts that besiege it. As we embark on this exploration of Girard’s thought, remember, we’re not just dissecting dry theory; we’re unravelling the mysteries of human behaviour itself. So, fasten your intellectual seat belts; we’re in for a fascinating ride.

Summary – Philosophies and Ideologies

1. Mimetic Desire: At the heart of Girard’s philosophy is the concept of mimetic desire, suggesting that our desires are not original but are imitated from others. This imitation leads to rivalry, as individuals often desire the same objects or status.
2. Scapegoat Mechanism: Girard proposed that societies resolve inherent conflicts through a scapegoat mechanism, where an individual or group is unjustly blamed for societal problems, restoring harmony at their expense.
3. Violence and the Sacred: He explored the interconnection between violence and sacred rituals in his work, arguing that sacrificial systems in religions are a means to control violence within a society.
4. Literary Criticism: Girard’s unique approach to literary criticism involved viewing characters in literature through the lens of mimetic desire and the scapegoat mechanism, revealing deep insights into human behaviour and societal structures.
5. Interdividual Psychology: Moving beyond traditional notions of individual psychology, Girard introduced the concept of interdividual psychology, focusing on the relational dynamics between individuals driven by mimetic desire.

In the following sections, we’ll delve into each of these concepts, breaking down Girard’s profound ideas into digestible insights that illuminate the complex interplay of desire, conflict, and resolution in human societies.

Mimetic Desire: Unravelling the Tapestry of Human Want

Dive into the crux of René Girard’s intellectual odyssey, and you’ll find the concept of mimetic desire, an idea so compelling and foundational that it might just change how you view every spat over a parking space or the silent wars in office corridors. Mimetic desire is the theory that our desires are not entirely our own; rather, they are borrowed, imitated from those around us. Imagine, if you will, a world where your craving for that slice of cake isn’t really about the cake but about mirroring someone else’s desire for it. Welcome to Girard’s ground-breaking vision of human desire and conflict.

At first blush, mimetic desire seems a straightforward concept: we see, we covet, we imitate. However, its implications are profound and far-reaching. Girard posited that this imitative desire is the bedrock upon which human relationships and, indeed, societies are built—and not in a “we all want what’s best for each other” kind of way, but in a “your desire for X makes me desire X too, and now we’re rivals” kind of way. This rivalry, born out of imitation, is the genesis of conflict and violence in human interactions.

The theory emerged from Girard’s initial work in literary criticism, where he observed that characters within stories often desire objects not for their intrinsic value but because another character desires them. This triangular desire—subject, object, model—reveals that our desires are relational rather than individual. The ‘model’ in this triangle can be anyone perceived as a possessor of something desirable: a peer, a public figure, or even a character in a novel.

Girard took this observation from the realm of fiction into the fabric of reality, arguing that mimetic desire is a fundamental force driving human behavior. It’s why fashion trends catch on, why keeping up with the Joneses is a full-time job for some, and why social media platforms are battlegrounds of envy and imitation. Our societies, according to Girard, are theatres of endless mimetic contests.

But it’s not all catfights over who wore it better or silent feuds over lawn sizes. The flip side of this mimetic coin is a darker propensity for conflict escalation. As individuals and groups lock horns over mirrored desires, rivalry intensifies, leading to a cycle of retaliation and violence. This is where Girard’s theory takes a somber turn, suggesting that such conflicts, if left unchecked, have the potential to spiral out of control, tearing the very fabric of society apart.

However, Girard doesn’t leave us in a world doomed to endless mimetic warfare. He introduces the concept of the scapegoat mechanism as society’s emergency brake—a way to quell rising tensions and restore peace, albeit at a significant moral cost. By collectively projecting their rivalrous tensions onto a chosen scapegoat, societies achieve a temporary reprieve from the cycle of violence. This, Girard argues, is the genesis of the sacred, around which religions and societies have been organized, offering a controversial yet intriguing explanation for the role of sacrifice in cultural rituals.

In dissecting mimetic desire, Girard doesn’t just offer us a lens through which to view literature or anthropology; he hands us the keys to understanding the engine of human society itself. From the mundane to the monumental, the echoes of mimetic desire can be heard, revealing the imitative nature of our wants, the conflicts they spawn, and the rituals we perform to keep those conflicts at bay. It’s a theory that does more than explain; it illuminates, offering a glimpse into the hidden mechanics of human desire and the lengths we go to satisfy it, often at the expense of others.

Scapegoat Mechanism: The Shadow Play of Society’s Peace

In the grand theatre of human interaction, where desires clash and conflicts brew, René Girard introduces a plot twist that has been recurring throughout the history of societies: the scapegoat mechanism. This is not your everyday blame game or passing the buck in the office; it’s an ancient, deeply embedded psychological drama that plays out on a societal scale, offering a temporary solution to the otherwise unending cycle of mimetic violence. Girard’s theory shines a spotlight on how societies achieve catharsis and regain harmony by sacrificing an innocent party, a scapegoat, to bear the brunt of collective tensions and hostilities.

The scapegoat mechanism is a societal safety valve, according to Girard. When the mimetic rivalries, born from imitative desires, threaten to unravel the social fabric, communities instinctively seek a unifying solution to restore order. Enter the scapegoat: an individual or a group singled out to be blamed for the crisis at hand, regardless of their actual involvement or guilt. This figure becomes the repository of collective aggression, absorbing the community’s pent-up violence and, through their exclusion or sacrifice, reconciling the community with itself.

This process is as fascinating as it is macabre. The selection of the scapegoat follows a peculiar logic, wherein the victim is often marginal, different enough to be easily othered, yet close enough to be a plausible cause of the community’s ills. This could be an outsider, a minority, or any vulnerable member within the society who can be credibly linked to the perceived source of conflict or misfortune. The key is that their persecution must be seen as justifiable within the narrative the community constructs to rationalize the act.

Girard’s exploration of the scapegoat mechanism is not limited to primitive societies or ancient rituals; it extends to the very heart of modern civilization. He argues that the dynamics of scapegoating can be observed in contemporary issues like political witch hunts, social media shaming campaigns, and even in the mechanisms of justice and penal systems. The underlying principle remains unchanged: the act of scapegoating serves to defuse tensions and reinforce social cohesion by projecting and expelling internal conflicts onto an external entity.

However, the peace achieved through scapegoating is inherently fragile and temporary. It does not address the root causes of mimetic desire and rivalry but merely resets the cycle, awaiting the next crisis. Girard’s insight into the scapegoat mechanism is a profound commentary on the human condition, revealing our propensity for violence and the lengths to which societies will go to preserve order and unity, often at the expense of justice and morality.

The significance of Girard’s theory lies not just in its explanation of ancient rituals but in its applicability to understanding the mechanisms of conflict resolution, the formation of myths, and the genesis of religious and judicial systems. It prompts a reevaluation of our approaches to conflict, challenging us to find solutions that address the underlying mimetic desires rather than perpetuating the cycle of violence through scapegoating.

In a world rife with conflict, Girard’s theory of the scapegoat mechanism offers a critical lens through which to examine our own societal practices, inviting a deeper reflection on the ethical implications of our means of restoring peace and order. It is a call to transcend the primitive logic of scapegoating, urging societies to seek more humane and just resolutions to the mimetic crises that beset us.

Violence and the Sacred: The Dual Faces of Humanity’s Rituals

René Girard’s exploration into the realms of desire and conflict leads us to a captivating intersection: the nexus of Violence and the Sacred. Here, in this conceptual crossroad, Girard unveils how societies have historically navigated the tumultuous waters of communal violence, tethering the tempests of aggression to the moorings of sacred rituals. This isn’t about the odd rough-and-tumble or the metaphorical throwing of punches in spirited debate. It’s about the inherent violence lurking within human communities and the ingenious, albeit morally ambiguous, ways in which this violence is curtailed and transformed into the bedrock of cultural and religious institutions.

Girard’s thesis posits that violence is an inextricable part of human nature, a direct offspring of mimetic desire. As individuals and communities lock horns in a mimetic rivalry, the escalation of conflict seems inevitable. Left unchecked, this violence threatens to consume society from within. The solution, paradoxically, lies in violence itself—specifically, in the ritualized violence directed towards a scapegoat. This act, though brutal, serves a dual purpose: it channels and purifies communal aggression, averting the potential for all-out conflict, and it reinforces the social fabric through the collective participation in a sacred ritual.

The sacred, in Girard’s framework, is born from this very act of violence. The community, having expelled its violent impulses through the sacrifice of a scapegoat, elevates the act to a sacred status. The victim is transfigured into a sacred entity, simultaneously reviled for their supposed guilt and revered for their role in restoring peace. This duality forms the foundation of many religious and cultural rituals across the globe, where the sacred is intrinsically linked to acts of sacrificial violence.

What’s truly fascinating about Girard’s analysis is how it reframes our understanding of religious sacrifice. Far from being mere acts of devotion or piety, these rituals are seen as society’s unconscious mechanisms to control and contain its own violent tendencies. The sacred becomes a container for violence, a way to simultaneously acknowledge and constrain the destructive potential within each community.

This theory also sheds light on the origin of myths and gods within various cultures. The deification of the scapegoat, post-sacrifice, often gives rise to stories that justify and sanctify the act. Over time, these narratives become central to the religious and cultural identity of a society, encoding the memory of the sacrificial act into the collective consciousness as something divine and necessary.

Girard’s insights into the relationship between violence and the sacred challenge us to reconsider the foundations of our most revered traditions and beliefs. It prompts questions about the nature of violence in human society and the ethical implications of our methods for managing it. In highlighting the sacrificial origins of the sacred, Girard invites a critical reflection on how we might move beyond these archaic mechanisms to resolve conflict and achieve social cohesion.

In a world still haunted by the spectres of violence, Girard’s theory offers a sobering reminder of the costs of peace and the complex interplay between our basest impulses and our highest ideals. “Violence and the Sacred” is not just a theoretical exploration; it’s a mirror reflecting the ancient rituals that still shape our modern lives, urging us to confront the violence within and seek more enlightened paths to harmony.

Literary Criticism: Through the Girardian Lens

René Girard’s foray into the realm of literary criticism might at first seem a detour from his profound explorations of mimetic desire, violence, and the sacred. Yet, it is within the tapestry of literature that Girard finds the richest illustrations of his theories, turning the act of reading into a revelatory experience. His approach does not merely add another layer of interpretation; it fundamentally alters the landscape of literary analysis, illuminating the hidden dynamics of desire, rivalry, and scapegoating that underpin narrative structures.

Girard’s literary criticism is grounded in his concept of mimetic desire. He posits that this imitative desire is not only a driving force in human behaviour but also a central theme in literature. Characters within novels, plays, and epics often do not desire objects or people because of their inherent qualities but because these objects or people are desired by others. This triangular desire—comprising the subject, the object, and the mediator (or model)—is a recurrent motif in classic and modern literature, from the rivalries in Dostoevsky’s novels to the covetous love triangles in Shakespeare’s plays.

One of Girard’s most significant contributions to literary criticism is his analysis of the scapegoat mechanism within texts. He uncovers how literature not only reflects societal practices of scapegoating but also participates in them, often presenting victims who are unjustly blamed and persecuted. This scapegoating serves various narrative functions, providing catharsis, moral lessons, or ironic critiques of societal norms. Through Girardian analysis, texts reveal their deeper engagement with the processes of mimetic desire and the mechanisms of violence and reconciliation in human societies.

Girard also challenges the traditional autonomy of characters in literature, arguing that their desires, actions, and conflicts are deeply entwined with the desires of others. This perspective shifts the focus from individual characters to the relationships between them, exploring how identities are formed and deformed in the crucible of communal desire. It prompts a reevaluation of character motivation, narrative tension, and the thematic underpinnings of literary works, offering a lens that brings into sharp focus the mimetic nature of human interaction.

Moreover, Girard’s approach to literary criticism illuminates the role of the reader in the mimetic triangle. The act of reading itself becomes a mimetic experience, as readers navigate their desires, identifications, and repulsions in relation to characters and their desires. This not only enriches the interpretative process but also implicates readers in the dynamics of desire and rivalry, making the reading of literature a participatory and reflective experience.

Girard’s literary criticism extends beyond the confines of individual texts to address the cultural and historical dimensions of literature. He explores how literary evolution reflects changes in societal understanding and engagement with mimetic desire and violence. By doing so, Girard not only offers a methodology for interpreting texts but also for understanding the evolution of cultural narratives and their role in shaping, and being shaped by, human societies.

In employing Girardian analysis, literary criticism gains a powerful tool for dissecting the complexities of narrative, character, and theme. It reveals literature as a mirror of human desire and conflict, a stage where the dramas of mimetic rivalry and scapegoating are both enacted and resolved. Girard’s contribution to literary criticism invites readers and scholars alike to look beneath the surface of narrative and character, to uncover the underlying forces that drive literature and life alike.

Interdividual Psychology: Beyond the Individual Mind

In the intricate dance of René Girard’s intellectual contributions, one of the most compelling steps is his concept of interdividual psychology. This idea, while perhaps less known than his theories of mimetic desire and the scapegoat mechanism, is no less revolutionary. It challenges the very foundations of how we understand human psychology, shifting the focus from the isolated individual to the complex web of relationships that define human existence. Girard’s insight here is profound: we are not self-contained units of desire and decision, but mirrors reflecting the desires, conflicts, and identities of those around us.

Interdividual psychology is predicated on the idea that human beings are inherently relational. Our desires, our sense of self, even our conflicts and resolutions, are not purely our own but are deeply entangled with the desires and identities of others. This is an extension of Girard’s theory of mimetic desire, which posits that our wants are imitated from those we observe and interact with. In a sense, Girard suggests that the psyche is not solely an internal landscape but a space where the internal and external meet, where the self is constantly being shaped and reshaped by its encounters with others.

This perspective offers a radical departure from traditional psychological models that prioritize individual agency and interiority. Instead, Girard invites us to consider the psyche as a communal battleground, a place where the individual is formed and deformed in the crucible of social interaction. This doesn’t negate the importance of the individual but highlights the profound influence of the social and relational on individual development and behavior.

Interdividual psychology illuminates various aspects of human behavior and conflict. For instance, it sheds light on the phenomenon of groupthink, where the desire for harmony within a group leads to irrational or dysfunctional decision-making processes. It also provides a framework for understanding phenomena such as social contagion, where ideas, emotions, and behaviors spread through a population in a mimetic fashion, often bypassing rational analysis.

Moreover, Girard’s concept challenges the traditional psychoanalytic focus on intra-psychic conflicts, suggesting that many conflicts attributed to internal processes are actually reflections of external, relational dynamics. This reorientation has significant implications for therapeutic practices, suggesting that healing and resolution may often require addressing the mimetic structures and dynamics within which the individual is embedded, rather than focusing solely on internal psychological states.

Interdividual psychology also has profound implications for understanding identity formation. Girard’s framework suggests that our sense of self is not a monolithic, self-generated construct but a mosaic of imitated desires, roles, and relationships. This view aligns with contemporary understandings of identity as fluid and socially constructed, further blurring the lines between the individual and the collective.

In the realm of literature and cultural studies, interdividual psychology offers a powerful lens for analysis, revealing how characters and narratives are constructed not just around individual protagonists but around networks of relationships and desires. It highlights the interdependent nature of identity and desire, offering new insights into the complexities of character motivation and narrative dynamics.

René Girard’s interdividual psychology invites us to reconceptualize the human psyche as a site of interaction and mimicry, where the boundaries between self and other are perpetually negotiated. This perspective doesn’t just add nuance to our understanding of psychological processes; it revolutionizes how we conceive of identity, desire, and conflict, highlighting the fundamentally relational nature of human existence. In doing so, Girard not only challenges the orthodoxy of psychological science but also offers a richer, more complex picture of what it means to be human.

Importance and Wider Significance

René Girard’s theories, spanning from mimetic desire to interdividual psychology, constitute a formidable intellectual legacy that transcends the boundaries of philosophy and infiltrates the realms of sociology, anthropology, psychology, and literary criticism. His insights have illuminated the underpinnings of human behavior, culture, and society, offering a profound understanding of the dynamics of desire, violence, and the sacred that shape human existence. But what is the wider significance of Girard’s work, and how has it influenced contemporary thought and beyond?

The importance of Girard’s work lies not only in its innovative theoretical framework but also in its applicability to a myriad of disciplines and real-world phenomena. His concept of mimetic desire, for instance, provides a foundational understanding of social dynamics, consumer culture, and the mechanisms of desire that drive economic and social systems. This theory has been instrumental in analyzing the nature of rivalry and conflict in various contexts, from personal relationships to international politics, offering insights into the origins and resolutions of conflict.

The scapegoat mechanism, another cornerstone of Girard’s thought, has profound implications for understanding the processes of social cohesion and exclusion. It sheds light on historical and contemporary instances of scapegoating, from witch hunts to modern-day social media shaming, and has been pivotal in the study of collective behavior, social crises, and the mechanisms of social healing. Girard’s analysis of the scapegoat mechanism has also influenced the fields of theology and religious studies, offering a critical perspective on the role of sacrifice in religious and cultural rituals.

Girard’s exploration of violence and the sacred has prompted a reevaluation of the origins and functions of religion, myth, and ritual in society. His work challenges conventional views on the nature of the sacred, proposing that the divine is deeply intertwined with human violence and the mechanisms of community formation. This perspective has not only enriched theological and anthropological discussions but has also influenced the study of peace and conflict resolution, highlighting the potential for transforming violent impulses into constructive social bonds.

In literary criticism, Girard’s theories offer a revolutionary approach to understanding narrative and character motivation, revealing the mimetic structures that underlie literary works. His work has inspired a rethinking of the role of literature in reflecting and shaping human desire and conflict, influencing literary theory and criticism in profound ways.

Beyond academia, Girard’s theories have permeated popular culture, influencing writers, filmmakers, and cultural commentators. His ideas have contributed to the discourse on issues such as consumerism, social media dynamics, and the nature of desire in the modern world. Girard’s work continues to inspire those seeking to understand the complexities of human behavior and society, offering tools to navigate the challenges of communal life and conflict.

In conclusion, the wider significance of René Girard’s work lies in its enduring relevance and applicability to a broad spectrum of human experience. His theories provide a lens through which to view the foundational elements of human society—desire, violence, and the mechanisms of cohesion and exclusion. Girard’s intellectual legacy is a testament to the power of interdisciplinary thinking and its capacity to offer insights into the human condition, challenging us to reconsider our understanding of ourselves and the societies we inhabit.

René Girard’s theories offer a profound framework for understanding the complex interplay of desire, violence, and the sacred in human life. His interdisciplinary approach continues to inspire and challenge, providing invaluable insights into the depths of human behavior and the structures of society.

Reading List

1. “Violence and the Sacred” by René Girard – A pivotal work that explores the role of violence in society and its relationship to religious sacrifice.
2. “Things Hidden Since the Foundation of the World” by René Girard – Offers a comprehensive overview of Girard’s theories on mimetic desire, scapegoating, and the foundations of culture.
3. “Deceit, Desire, and the Novel” by René Girard – Girard’s seminal work on mimetic desire in literature, analyzing the works of Cervantes, Dostoevsky, Flaubert, Stendhal, and Proust.
4. “The Scapegoat” by René Girard – Explores the mechanism of scapegoating through historical and literary examples.
5. “I See Satan Fall Like Lightning” by René Girard – A more accessible introduction to Girard’s key ideas, focusing on mimetic desire, scapegoating, and the biblical perspective.

Following links from the reading list helps us. As an Amazon Associate we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you… so thank you if you click.

Online Resources:

• Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: René Girard
• Wikipedia: René Girard